We still don't know whether existence itself can be considered fundamentally good, neutral, or something we should be more cautious about creating.
open
Global / Unspecified, Global
Some philosophical traditions argue coming into existence carries a built-in risk of harm that non-existence avoids entirely, while most people intuitively value life as a good in itself. This unresolved debate underlies serious questions in population ethics.
Citation ID: WS01106
Title: We still don't know whether existence itself can be considered fundamentally good, neutral, or something we should be more cautious about creating.
URL: https://worldsolve.org/index.php?api=problem&id=1106